Cricket South Africa has “formally and unreservedly” withdrawn the charges of gross misconduct against men’s national head coach Mark Boucher, less than a week before his disciplinary hearing was scheduled to begin. The board is no longer seeking his dismissal over the tentative findings of the Social Justice and Nation-Building (SJN) report, which concluded that Boucher may have engaged in conduct that was prejudicial on the basis of race.Following Paul Adams and Enoch Nkwe deciding to not testify at the hearings, and the outcome of former director of cricket Graeme Smith’s arbitration, which cleared him on all counts, CSA found the charges were no longer sustainable.Related
-
Boucher's exit after eventful tenure leaves big hole in coaching staff
-
Bavuma puts spotlight on 'inclusive leadership group' as SA look to move on after turbulent 12 months
-
England are finally becoming the team they wanted to be – New Zealand
-
To be meaningful, follow-up to SJN process must go beyond Graeme Smith and Mark Boucher
-
Graeme Smith cleared of racism charges
Boucher was facing three charges over his handling of historical and current race-based issues during his time as a national player and a coach. This included his role in singing a team song with the words “b**** s***” in it, directed at Adams during their playing days, his handling of the Black Lives Matter movement with the current squad, and his working relationship with former assistant coach Nkwe. Since the SJN report could not make definite findings on the seriousness of these incidents, CSA “was advised by external lawyers that the appropriate formal process to follow in respect of Mr Boucher was a formal disciplinary hearing in front of an independent ombudsman”. However, CSA could find no basis to sustain the charges because of a lack of witnesses.In a statement issued on Tuesday morning, CSA confirmed that Adams’ announcement on Sunday that he would not testify reiterated his initial statement that his testimony at the SJN was about the “overall culture” of the national team in the early 2000s and that he did not want to single out any player. In his oral testimony, Adams had recounted the anecdote which led to him being given the nickname “b**** s****” and it was the ombudsman’s assistant Fumisa Ngqele who then asked him, “When Mark Boucher called you “b**** s***, did you address him personally?” Adams responded: “No, well, I never addressed them personally. Mark was probably just one of the guys that did all that.” Adams’ written statement made no mention of Boucher either.Further, Boucher apologised to Adams and CSA’s lawyers have ascertained that Adams had accepted the apology, which left them with no case to make against Boucher with regards to the song.On the matter of Nkwe, the chargesheet against Boucher claimed that he had not provided “roles and responsibilities” or “meaningful key-performance indicators” for him, did not define his role or any development plans for him, and thus, “allegedly treated Mr Nkwe in a manner unbecoming of a leader in your position”. Nkwe’s unwillingness to testify meant CSA could not pursue this route either.There was no mention of why CSA could not sustain the charge around the handling of the BLM movement other than a comment that they had “engaged with various other potential witnesses over the last month and concluded that none of the three charges were sustainable”. While Boucher had intended to call several current players to testify on his behalf, ESPNcricinfo understands that CSA could not secure the same, and, having noted the outcome of Smith’s arbitration, felt it would not be able to make the charges against Boucher stand.In the case of Smith, who was cleared last month, CSA failed to prove that Smith’s appointment of Boucher as head coach discriminated against Nkwe on the basis of race. CSA’s shortcomings in that case, where it was also unable to prove factual causation that Smith had influenced Thami Tsolekile’s non-selection on the basis of race, and led the board to believe it would not be able to make a strong legal argument against Boucher.With Smith’s case concluded, and his tenure as director of cricket ended, and the withdrawing of the charges against Boucher, CSA’s battles with two of the most influential men in the country’s cricket have ended, and the board is eager to take a big-picture view of the anti-racist process over the last 18 months.Mark Boucher – “The last few months have been extremely difficult to endure for me and my family”•Gallo Images/Getty Images
“The SJN process was never only or even mainly about the conduct of individuals. More fundamentally, it was about providing a platform for persons involved in cricket to share their personal experiences of racial and gender discrimination and to allow for a careful consideration of the systemic measures necessary to redress these issues going forward for the future,” Lawson Naidoo, CSA’s board chair, said. “The Board will in the near future announce further systemic initiatives in this regard. The systemic learnings from the SJN process will provide valuable input into the values, behaviours, culture and strategy of Cricket in South Africa going forward and we thank all participants for their contributions in this regard.”Boucher welcomed the decision and committed himself to the national team for the remainder of his contract, which runs to the end of the 2023 World Cup.”The allegations of racism which were levelled against me were unjustified and have caused me considerable hurt and anguish,” he said in a statement. “The last few months have been extremely difficult to endure for me and my family. I am glad that the process has finally come to an end and that CSA has accepted that the charges against me are unsustainable. I consider that the matter is now finalised and closed and I do not intend on making further statements on this matter. I look forward to continuing to focus on my job and to taking the Proteas men’s team to even greater heights.”Boucher continued to acknowledge the insensitivity of team culture in his playing days and maintained that the environment in the current squad has been healthy.”I stand by my apology to Paul given during the SJN process for the hurt he felt during his time as a Proteas player. As I stated in my affidavit to the SJN process, some of the things that were said and done in those days were totally inappropriate and unacceptable and in retrospect, understandably offensive,” he said. “I am proud to now be part of a team culture that is inclusive and whose objective is to be respectful to every person.”
